I hate writing the HTML for emails, and clients rarely understand that it takes a long time to make an email look like their wonderfully designed website.
This is a good reference for anyone setting out to create a new mailout.
The key phrase here is "innocent". Why should anyone who is deemed innocent have their DNA kept at all? What possible justification could there be for keeping this sort of data for innocent people? Or are we assuming the police never make mistakes?
To top it off, "Unconvicted adults" have their detail held longer than someone convicted of a minor offence.
Perfectly describes my own feelings on this subject. Chrome OS is only in competition with the netbook version of windows, a teeny tiny Market already full of various linux flavours.
Perfectly describes my own feelings on this subject. Chrome OS is only in competition with the netbook version of windows, a teeny tiny Market already full of various linux flavours.
Presumably the media will give this as much coverage as the original hoax and all those people mocking the tattoist and believing the girl's story are going to apologise? Do these people ever do any research? Has anyone ever fallen asleep whilst getting any tattoo? Was clearly nonsense from the start but given far too much credibility by a media that doesn't understand tattoos.
How can someone think this is acceptable behaviour? He's stealing money from his donors, and therefore from the Sick Kids Hospital he promised the money too. And there is zero remorse. Not very "Christian" is it?